She attended Huntingdon College in Montgomery —45and then studied law at the University of Alabama — While attending college, she wrote for campus literary magazines:
Share via Email Harper Lee in a courthouse while visiting her home town.
|From the SparkNotes Blog||Justice is an important theme in To Kill a Mockingbird, in which Scout confronts difficult truths about bias and racism within her community. She learns that while the courts can be a potential source of justice, there are also other ways of achieving justice outside the courtroom.|
|Atticus Finch - Wikipedia||Lori Steinbach Certified Educator Harper Lee set To Kill a Mockingbird in the segregated South during the s, so it is not surprising that she addresses the issue of racial prejudice in this novel. The characters are black and white,|
|Navigate Guide||The heroic character of Atticus Finch has been held up as a role model of moral virtue and impeccable character for lawyers to emulate. To Kill a Mockingbird has endured as a mainstay on high school and college reading lists.|
Most people agreed that the book is more complicated than its critics may have suggested — and that Harper Lee is neither childish nor simplistic in her portrayal of good and bad.
But within that broad consensus, there was a fascinating variety of opinion. I was particularly impressed by the analysis of the novel's commentary on the rule of law.
The comment that started this discussion, from Amtiskawmore than deserves to be quoted in full — with the caveat that you may not want to read it, if you haven't yet reached the end of the novel.
It deals with the conclusion in detail: The evidence in favour of Tom Robinson and against Bob Ewell is overwhelming Ewell is not on trial, but Atticus essentially constructs his defence case as a prosecution against the other man.
In the end, the jury convicts Robinson, choosing to deliberately ignore the evidence and the proper course of justice because it conflicts with their bigoted morality. The secondary plot of the novel concerns Boo Radley, a neighbourhood recluse who, at the novel's climax, intercepts and kills Bob Ewell in order to prevent him taking revenge on Atticus by attacking and perhaps murdering his children.
In the aftermath, both Atticus and the sheriff realise what has happened, but agree to fabricate a story that Ewell fell on his own knife, rather than subject Boo Radley to an investigation that, even if it would probably lead to his exoneration on the grounds of justifiable homicide, would drag the reclusive man into the limelight.
The book portrays the latter decision as an attempt to protect an innocent person rather than condemn him, and leads to the metaphor of the book's title, where to kill a mockingbird is to deliberately destroy something innocent, which suggests the author agrees with the decision.
However, there is still an uncomfortable parallel between the actions of Atticus and the sheriff in protecting Boo Radley, and that of the jurors in the Tom Robinson trial.
All are participants within a criminal justice system with a responsibility to the truth, but who choose to ignore it in order to achieve what they consider the "right" result, based on their personal morality.
We sympathise with Atticus and the sheriff's morality, while finding the racist townsfolk's [morality] reprehensible, but does that make the decision of the former OK?
Both conspire to pervert the course of justice, but we are prompted to absolve one but condemn the other based on our own prejudices. For me, this the book's greatest flaw: Morality should be enshrined in the law and applied impartially to all through public mechanisms such as trials, not privately or subject to the whims of individuals.
Even if it doesn't always result in the best outcome for people like Boo Radley, it is the best system for giving the fairest outcome in the most cases. I don't see the Boo Radley dilemma as a "flaw" in the novel. Doesn't it just add another layer of ambiguity and interest?
Leaving Boo Radley to retreat back into his exile is an emotionally satisfying ending — and as Amtiskaw points out, it chimes well with the novel's title and the idea that you should leave the rare and harmless bird alone.
However, the decision to let Boo retreat back into the shadows isn't just a Hollywood conclusion.To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee - Justice Essay example Words | 3 Pages. To Kill a Mockingbird Justice One of the themes in ' To Kill a Mockingbird' is injustice.
I am going to show how other characters apart from Tom Robinson are affected by injustice. Two of the characters affected in this way are Boo Radley and Mayella Ewell. To Kill a Mockingbird: Discrimination Against Race, Gender, and Class Scout and Jem sit with their father, Atticus.
Harper Lee’s classic novel To Kill a Mockingbird centers on a young girl named Jean Louise “Scout” Finch. Her father Atticus Fincher, a lawyer, takes a case to defend a black man accused of raping a white woman. Struggling with themes such as Justice and Judgment in Harper Lee's To Kill a Mockingbird?
We've got the quick and easy lowdown on it here. In To Kill a Mockingbird, justice is a privilege, not a right. You want a fair trial? Well, we sure hope you were lucky enough to be born white. What's the novel's take on the American legal system.
Harper Lee’s classic novel To Kill a Mockingbird centers on a young girl named Jean Louise “Scout” Finch. Her father Atticus Fincher, a lawyer, takes a case to .
In To Kill a Mockingbird, the criminal court system may be broken, but it's still the best chance for justice. To Kill a Mockingbird contrasts court-justice and vigilante -justice to show that they both have strengths and weaknesses. To Kill a Mockingbird: a book that still raises questions about 'good' justice Harper Lee's novel, our Reading group pick, must not be dismissed as a children's book and is more tricky than it seems.